Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Globe Gives Immigration Terrorist Megaphone

Truthfully, readers, even I was shocked.

Related:
Quick Stop at the Amnesty Office

Today's quote:

We’re going to overturn this unjust and racist law, and then we’re going to overturn the power structure that created this unjust, racist law’’ -- Representative Raul Grijalva of Arizona, a Democrat

And then the poor illegals went and got violent!

Isn't that TREASON, SEDITION, and TERRORISM?

But the MSM FOCUS is on the FALSE-FLAG, AGENT PROVOCATEUR HOAXES that really expose the desperation of the globalist forces and their tools in government and amongst the population.



"Conflicts escalate in Arizona over tough immigration law; Thousands join angry protests in state capital" by Jonathan J. Cooper, Associated Press | April 27, 2010

PHOENIX — The conflict over a sweeping crackdown on illegal immigration in Arizona intensified yesterday as vandals smeared refried beans in the shape of swastikas on the State Capitol’s windows.

Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!


Sorry, readers, excuse me for a second.

Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!


NOBODY STANDS with those
GOVERNMENT-BACKED LOSERS anymore!!

STOP the
FALSE FLAG HOAXES generated to GAIN SYMPATHY for the cause!!

More protests were planned after thousands gathered over the weekend to demonstrate against a bill that will make it a state crime to be an illegal immigrant in Arizona.

Ever notice that ANY TIME the ILLEGALS stage a PROTEST the MSM is RIGHT ON IT?

Of course, if you are NOT a gay, global-warmer, illegal, or supporter of the agenda the coverage is insulting or
invisible.

Opponents say the law will lead to rampant racial profiling and turn Arizona into a police state with provisions that require police to question people about their immigrant status if officers suspect they are here illegally.

I'm sorry; I did not see them out protesting the federal government as they contruct their own, so the sympathy and empathy for illegals -- please remember that, readers -- just is not there for them. Sorry.

Day laborers can be arrested for soliciting work if they are in the country illegally, and police departments can be sued if they don’t carry out the law.

But

Does that word get a kickback or royalty from the paper?

They use it often enough.

supporters of the law,

Yes, back to the agenda-pushing masquerading as news.

set to take effect in late July or August, say it is necessary to protect Arizonans from a litany of crimes committed by illegal immigrants.

RACISM!! RACISM! True, but RACISM!

Related: Israel's Solution to Illegal Immigration

No, not racism, sorry.

CRIMINAL, but not racist.

Arizona is home to an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants.

And they are not the best and the brightest Mexico is sending us, either.

Governor Jan Brewer, who signed the bill on Friday, argues Arizona must act because the federal government has failed to stop the steady stream of illegal immigrants and drugs that move through the state from Mexico.

Yeah, and just over the border the state is collapsing because of the double-crossing, double-dealing, government-directed, diversionary drug war.

The fallout over the dispute spread across the border yesterday as President Felipe Calderon of Mexico said the law is discriminatory and warned that relations with the US border state will suffer. Calderon says trade and political ties with Arizona will be “seriously affected,’’ although he announced no concrete measures.

WHO CARES?

Is that SOME SORT of THREAT, or... ??

I say SEND 'EM ALL BACK THEN!

F*** that New World Order puke!

The law has revved up the national debate, drawing the attention of the Obama administration and Congress....

Gee, how fortuitous for the agenda, huh?

The new law makes it a crime to be in the country illegally.

Yeah, WHAT PART of ILLEGAL and LAW does the agenda-pushing MSM not understand?

Immigrants unable to produce documents showing they are legal could be arrested, jailed for up to six months, and fined $2,500.

WHY NOT?

I HAVE TO everywhere I go, and I AM a CITIZEN!!!!!

Arizona officers would arrest people found to be undocumented and turn them over to federal immigration officers. Opponents said the federal government can block the law by refusing to accept them.

Well, when the PARTY, 'er, the GOVERNMENT is ABOVE the LAW or IGNORES the LAW, you know what you have, don't you, America?

I smell a bit of FASCISM, don't you?

US Representative Raul Grijalva, a Democrat, asked the federal government not to cooperate when illegal immigrants are picked up by local police.

Why not?

They DO NOT LISTEN to STATES or the PEOPLE on anything else. And I keep coming back to that word ILLEGAL!!

Can I DO SOMETHING ILLEGAL, readers?

Yeah, I suppose so -- if I don't get caught or framed by government.

Of course, those rules are only for you and me, not them.

State Senator Russell Pearce, the Republican who sponsored the legislation, said it’s “pretty disappointing’’ that opponents would call on the federal government to refuse to cooperate with Arizona authorities. “It’s outrageous that these people continue to support law breakers over law keepers,’’ Pearce said Sunday.

I must be jaded; I expect it now.

Grijalva and civil rights activists promised to march in the streets and invite arrest by refusing to comply with the law. Police said the protests Sunday were peaceful.

Not what I saw.

But then again, I expect this now from my divisive, distorting, obfuscating, omitting, and agenda-pushing newspaper.

“We’re going to overturn this unjust and racist law, and then we’re going to overturn the power structure that created this unjust, racist law,’’ Grijalva said.

They put that inflammatory statement in the paper again, readers?

US Representative Luis Gutierrez, Democrat of Illinois, called on President Obama to live up to a campaign promise to pass immigration reform. Gutierrez is one of the nation’s loudest voices calling for a comprehensive immigration overhaul that would create a pathway to citizenship for the millions of illegal immigrants now in the United States.

“Our message today is: ‘Mr. President, we listened, and we came out in record massive numbers to support you,’’’ he said. “We need you to support us today.’’

I'm offended on so many levels by this.

Why should this special interest group be heard while the rest of us get the shaft?

The law has drawn support from many in Arizona who are fed up with the many problems brought on by illegal immigration.

That is the American people in a two-word phrase.

“If I go to another foreign country, if I go to Mexico, I have to have papers,’’ said Bill Baker, 60, who took time off work at a downtown Phoenix restaurant to sell umbrellas and Mexican and American flags to the largely Hispanic crowd of protesters. “So I don’t feel there’s anything particularly harsh about the law.’’

And that INSULTING PUKE CALDERON has the NERVE to CRITICIZE?

Supporters dismiss concerns about profiling, saying the law prohibits the use of race or nationality as the sole basis for an immigration check. Brewer has ordered state officials to develop a training course for officers to learn what constitutes reasonable suspicion that a person is in the United States illegally.

The March 27 shooting death of rancher Rob Krentz on his property in southeastern Arizona brought illegal immigration and border security into focus.

Oh, yeah, MINIMIZE the ILLEGAL MURDER that LED Arizona to act because the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT is CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT when it comes to PROTECTING OUR BORDERS -- one of its few Constitutional duties.

--more--"

And look who is out front on the issue, readers:

"Federal inertia on immigration fuels Arizona’s harsh law

.... These sweeping measures would be a harder sell if Congress were dealing forthrightly with the realities of illegal immigration. An estimated 12 million people are living in the United States in violation of federal law, yet the labor they provide is tightly woven into the US economy.

Related:

"federal immigration law allows people to hire illegal immigrants as domestic workers intermittently.... It is not illegal to hire an illegal immigrant"

"illegal immigrants, who mow the lawns, trim the hedges, clean the swimming pools, park the cars, serve the hors d'oeuvres, tidy up the mansions, and do many of the other things that make life so enjoyable for the rich"

Yeah, they would NOT WANT an American with all those ICKY-POOH TAXES like Social Security, etc, when they can have an illegal around for a few months at BELOW-MINIMUM WAGE STANDARDS!!


Also see: Hitching a Ride With Homeland Security

So the GOVERNMENT GAVE THEM a RIDE to a JOB YOU WOULDN'T DO, huh, Amurkn? Are you FINALLY SEEING the FRAUD of the entire "DEBATE" and the DISINGENUOUS NATURE of the agenda-pushing, Zionist-controlled press?

A comprehensive solution to this quandary must address not just border enforcement, but also workplace practices and the legal status of long-established immigrants. Arizona’s law has no ambitions beyond identifying, prosecuting, and deporting illegal immigrants. And the discretion it gives to law enforcement is disturbing. What arouses “reasonable suspicion’’? The type of vehicles people are driving? How they dress? Their skin color? Millions of US citizens were born in other countries and deserve to move about without being hassled.

Have they been to an American airport lately?

One wishes they were so concerned with citizen's rights or Muslims locked away forever in torture chambers, huh?

Yeah, the SELECTIVE MYOPIA of the agenda-pushing Boston Globe is a BIT MUCH to take after a while.

Millions of American Latinos carry no immigration documents because they were born in the United States. Even former US representative Tom Tancredo, an anti-immigration hard-liner from Colorado, told a Denver radio station that motorists must not be “pulled over because you look like you should be pulled over.’’

And NOW the GLOBE is LINING UP and CITING the NOTORIOUS RACIST Tancredo? Oh, readers!!!!

Indeed, the law opens a Pandora’s box of ugly possibilities. Will every non-Anglo visitor to Arizona become a potential target of police scrutiny?

The politics behind this stringent measure are as twisted as the law itself. Senator John McCain of Arizona once championed national immigration reform legislation, which Congress was never brave enough to take up.

Today, in a bow to the right, he backs his state’s new law as he fights off a challenge from J.D. Hayworth, a former conservative talk show radio host.

Oh, it is ALL POLITICS, huh, Globe?

Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona, another Republican, also backed the immigration measure, as she tries to neutralize conservatives who oppose her effort to raise taxes.

And she is a Republican, huh?

So letter doesn't even matter here in AmeriKa!

On the upside, the Arizona law has finally persuaded others in Washington of the urgency of federal immigration reform.

Yes, ALWAYS a POSITIVE when the AGENDA is ADVANCED!

Senate majority leader Harry Reid has signaled that he might want to take up immigration ahead of a climate-change bill.

See: Carbon Tax Morphs Into Energy Bill

Reid may be playing politics, too: Support from Hispanic voters in Nevada could help him win a tough reelection fight.

Yes, but SOMEHOW that is NOT SUBJECTED to the SAME CRITICISMS as the "right" -- whoever or whatever that means.

The United States needs an immigration system that is rooted in pragmatism rather than in politics. A well-crafted national reform can provide that — and would undermine support for measures like the Arizona law, which only stirs the pot of suspicion and fear.

That from the Muslim-hating, war-promoting, Zionist War Daily, hey!

Yeah, I AM INSULTED -- and so should you be, dear readers.

--more--"

Moving quickly for you today, readers; let's see if I can outrun an illegal pouring over the border.